Key Differences
In short — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Megaport - 97 vs 94 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1249.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dead Space than M2A Starship Mini - €13.29 vs €17.52 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.52/FPS
75.85616438356165%
Price, €
€1699
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46112 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
94
96.90721649484536%
Value, €/FPS
€13.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
96.46772228989039%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
97.91442700494515%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
85.7662757784068%
Multi-Core
9729
74.58601655933764%
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
