Key Differences
In short — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper STGsivir on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing STGsivir is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 49% better in Minecraft than STGsivir - 725 vs 485 FPS
Advantages of STGsivir Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1003.4 vs €1699.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Minecraft than M2A Starship Mini - €2.07 vs €2.34 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
725
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
88.46153846153845%
Price, €
€1699
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46074 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
485
66.89655172413794%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1003.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,003.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
51.948842874543246%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
42.78649752741346%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-8700B
null-core
Single-Core
1533
61.98948645369996%
Multi-Core
5875
45.03986507206378%
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | STGsivir Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-8700B |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
