Key Differences
In short — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper shinobee High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing shinobee High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Rust than shinobee High End - 144 vs 101 FPS
Advantages of shinobee High End Gaming PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €888.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Rust than M2A Starship Mini - €8.79 vs €11.8 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.8/FPS
74.4915254237288%
Price, €
€1699
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50199 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
101
70.13888888888889%
Value, €/FPS
€8.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€888
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €888 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71.92448233861145%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
50.78477746721135%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2317
93.69187221997574%
Multi-Core
10125
77.62189512419504%
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | shinobee High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
