Key Differences
In short — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 47% better in New World than Megaport - 107 vs 73 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €929.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing New World than M2A Starship Mini - €12.73 vs €15.88 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.88/FPS
80.16372795969772%
Price, €
€1699
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50191 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
73
68.22429906542055%
Value, €/FPS
€12.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€929
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71.92448233861145%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
50.78477746721135%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
85.7662757784068%
Multi-Core
9729
74.58601655933764%
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
