Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cube - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 21% cheaper than GameMachines Cube - - €1499.0 vs €1899.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing League of Legends than GameMachines Cube - - €4.84 vs €5.02 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 22% better in League of Legends than Megaport - 378 vs 310 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 763 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
378
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.02/FPS
96%
Price, €
€1899
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
22nd Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
85%
Multi-Core
13890
72%
7th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |