Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cube - outperforms the cheaper M2A Starship Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Up to 2% cheaper than GameMachines Cube - - €1699.0 vs €1729.0
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than M2A Starship Mini - 272 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing War Thunder than M2A Starship Mini - €6.36 vs €7.32 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FPS
232
85.29411764705883%
Value, €/FPS
€7.32/FPS
86.88524590163934%
Price, €
€1699
100%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46114 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1729
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
96.46772228989039%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
97.91442700494515%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
