Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper M2A Starship Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing M2A Starship Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than Megaport - €1699.0 vs €2099.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Megaport - €5.84 vs €5.9 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than M2A Starship Mini - 356 vs 291 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
291
81.74157303370787%
Value, €/FPS
€5.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46178 minutes ago
24th Variation
FPS
356
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.9/FPS
98.98305084745762%
Price, €
€2099
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
82.92929292929291%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
83.8924963924964%
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
null-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
