Key Differences
In short — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper dcl24 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing dcl24 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 29% better in Dead Space than dcl24 - 97 vs 75 FPS
Advantages of dcl24 Gaming PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1309.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 0% better value when playing Dead Space than M2A Starship Mini - €17.45 vs €17.52 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.52/FPS
99.60045662100457%
Price, €
€1699
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50267 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
75
77.31958762886599%
Value, €/FPS
€17.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1309
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71.92448233861145%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
50.78477746721135%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | dcl24 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-14700 |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1000 GB SSD |
