Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — M2A Starship Mini outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Storm - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 39% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GameMachines Storm - - 139 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GameMachines Storm - - €12.22 vs €12.49 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Storm - Gaming PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1249.0 vs €1699.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
73%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53286 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
100
71.94244604316546%
Value, €/FPS
€12.49/FPS
97.83827061649319%
Price, €
€1249
100%
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71.92448233861145%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
50.78477746721135%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Storm - Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |