Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2839 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Xeon W3565 - 751 vs 687 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 24 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
751
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |