Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3833 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Rust than Xeon W3565 - 207 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 20 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |