Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3055 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5520 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |