Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2698 v3 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2698 v3 is 6 days newer than FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-8370 - 117 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 125 vs 135 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
111
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$420
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |