Buy on Amazon
CA$420
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $319
Availability
MSRP in USD: $319
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2947 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 63% better in Rust than FX-8370 - 254 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$389.0 vs CA$420.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Rust than FX-8370 - CA$1.53 vs CA$2.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB FD8370FRHKBOX
Buy for CA$420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15658 minutes ago
Core i5-13600K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
254
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-13600K Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24M Cache, up to 5.1 GHz
Buy for CA$389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-13600K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
