Buy on Amazon
CA$420
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $242
Availability
MSRP in USD: $242
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - CA$420.0 vs CA$490.08
- Up to 2% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-13500 - CA$3.82 vs CA$3.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 15% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8370 - 126 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
110
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$420
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB FD8370FRHKBOX
Buy for CA$420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16371 minutes ago
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.89/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$490.08
85%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-13500 2.50GHz 14 Cores LGA1700 Desktop Processor Boxed (Raptor Lake) (BX8071513500)
Buy for CA$490.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16371 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
