Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - CA$220.0 vs CA$499.0
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 139% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8370 - 579 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8370 - CA$0.86 vs CA$0.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
579
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
44%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |