Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2387 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$220.0 vs CA$294.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i9-11900F - CA$1.44 vs CA$1.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-8370 - 194 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
153
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$294.99
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |