Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 301 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 120 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
301
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$508.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$508.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |