Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v2 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v2 is 690 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6100 - 273 vs 272 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
272
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |