Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 242 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 80 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 169 vs 150 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |