Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 259 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 54 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15307 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |