Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 669 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 224 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
224
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |