Buy on Amazon
CA$96.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1205 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2420 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$96.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
