Buy on Amazon
CA$99.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 is 146 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-6100 - 298 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
295
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
