Buy on Amazon
CA$98.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $282
Availability
MSRP in USD: $282
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 1468 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than FX-6100 - 120 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
