Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 1975 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |