Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G7400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G7400 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G7400
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 284 vs 249 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 30% cheaper than Pentium Gold G7400 - CA$98.43 vs CA$141.03
- Up to 20% better value when playing F1 22 than Pentium Gold G7400 - CA$0.4 vs CA$0.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G7400 - 6 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$141.03
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$141.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
249
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G7400 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |