Buy on Amazon
CA$122.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 162 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 19% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400T - CA$99.02 vs CA$122.95
- Up to 13% better value when playing Rust than Pentium Gold G5400T - CA$0.66 vs CA$0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 6 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$122.95
80%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T Processor 4M Cache 3.10 Ghz Lga1151 (OEM Tray CPU)
Buy for CA$122.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
