Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 495 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 249 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$303.46 vs CA$522.72
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$522.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74431 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
234
93.97590361445783%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.07155529272619%
Multi-Core
5794
71.94834223270831%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |