Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 2364 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6100 - 173 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
149
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |