Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 249 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$360.9 vs CA$769.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-14900KF - CA$1.62 vs CA$3.09 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
249
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.09/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$769.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$769.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2200 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
223
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |