Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900KF - 197 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$400.0 vs CA$769.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900KF - CA$2.31 vs CA$3.91 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.91/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$769.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$769.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2199 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |