Buy on Amazon
CA$659.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1620 - 246 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$32.99 vs CA$659.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.14 vs CA$2.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.68/FPS
5.223880597014926%
Price, CA$
CA$659.99
4%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$659.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
228
92.6829268292683%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
24.002347417840376%
Multi-Core
723
8.585678660491627%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
