Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Celeron G1620 vs Core i9-14900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
2.7 GHz | 2-core
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Buy for CA$864.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
2.7 GHz | 2-core
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Buy for CA$864.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
MSRP in USD: $524
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
316
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
414
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.09/FPS
5%
Price, CA$
CA$864.13
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$864.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |
Overwatch 2, 1920 x 1080, Epic
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Core i9-14900F
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$4,902.89
In Stock
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.