Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 199 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$853.06 vs CA$1393.07
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$853.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75511 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
89.44723618090453%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
61%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
38.77483443708609%
Multi-Core
7539
41.26436781609195%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |