Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 837 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 180 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 207 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 48 vs 32 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |