Buy on Amazon
CA$1,393.07
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - CA$1393.07 vs CA$1560.13
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10940X - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 4% better in DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 495 vs 478 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
478
96.56565656565657%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74429 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10940X Desktop Processor 14 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W, BX8069510940X
Buy for CA$1,560.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
74.96798975672215%
Multi-Core
7539
70.00650013928869%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
