Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3930K - 181 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$414.92 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3930K - CA$2.29 vs CA$2.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$414.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$414.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |