Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2773 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$32.99 vs CA$776.87
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 17% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1620 - 259 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65711 minutes ago
Buy for CA$776.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65711 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
23.265073947667805%
Multi-Core
723
8.524938096922533%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |