Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$417.0 vs CA$635.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$2.3 vs CA$3.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900 - 188 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$417
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$417 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.38/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$635
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |