Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700F - 595 vs 584 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$453.53 vs CA$599.98
- Up to 23% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$0.78 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
595
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$599.98
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$599.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$453.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$453.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |