Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$205.91 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 19% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.43 vs CA$0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-6800K - 494 vs 481 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
481
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$205.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$205.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
494
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |