Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$257.31 vs CA$319.02
- Up to 15% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600 - CA$1.27 vs CA$1.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i3-10320 - 213 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11743 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11743 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |