Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 855 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$214.29 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 70% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.73 vs CA$5.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 24 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
124
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.81/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |