Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$188.88 vs CA$385.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900 - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Core i7-6800K - 794 vs 683 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
683
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8632 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
794
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$385
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |