Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1619 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$210.63 vs CA$498.98
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$1.65 vs CA$3.42 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6800K - 146 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.42/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$498.98
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$498.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |