Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 33 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 13% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6100 - 256 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$99.02 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3930K - CA$0.44 vs CA$1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
256
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.95/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$499
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
226
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |