Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 136 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$303.46 vs CA$588.49
- Up to 41% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700F - CA$2.55 vs CA$4.33 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.33/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$588.49
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$588.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11203 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |