Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1620 - 246 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$36.89 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700K - CA$0.16 vs CA$1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$330
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
228
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |