Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 414 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 194 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$297.85 vs CA$303.46
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$297.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74421 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
95.36082474226805%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
98%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
84.39306358381504%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |